![]() ![]() This list provides us with renewed motivation to transfer basic research into new diagnostic procedures and into the development of therapeutic possibilities. These organisms are focal points of our work. And we at the institute work on three out of the four of the fungi designated as particularly critical: Aspergillus fumigatus, Candida albicans and Candida auris. Personally, I think the classification is very good because it integrates many factors. Epidemiology plays a role, but also how serious the diseases are. ![]() ![]() The ranking is based on various criteria. But because health systems, policy makers and funders underestimate the problem, and because diagnostic capabilities are limited, it is impossible to accurately estimate the global burden of fungal infections.ĭo you agree with the WHO classification and what does it mean for the work at the Leibniz-HKI? The topic was acknowledged recently in a commentary in Nature Reviews Microbiology: Every year, more than 300 million people are affected by severe fungal infections and more than 1.5 million die from these diseases. The list emphasizes the importance of the topic, which has not really been recognized by various groups so far, including clinicians. We started to develop our institute into a center for research on these important pathogens and the human immune response to them in 2006. And the list confirms that we have taken the right course at our institute. Brakhage, what was your reaction to the publication of the WHO's 'Fungal Priority Pathogens' list? Was it overdue? ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |